PC Magazine Article “The Problem With 5G” Cites Health Effects As A Reason Why 5G Technology Isn’t Worth The Risk
AUGUST 26, 2018 By B.N. Frank
How many health experts have to say that 5G isn’t worth the risk before this insane “Race for 5G” is finally stopped?Some continue to say there’s not enough research that proves it’s harmful. That’s simply not true. Proof of harm continues to be cited and reported. PC Magazine now joins the 5G opposition in their August 22, 2018 article,
Excerpts include:
The technology might be the problem, but even worse for the companies behind it is the perception that 5G is already unsafe before they even get it on a single pole.
Because the industry is too cheap to study the health effects of the technology itself, it lets this sort of product out the door despite the fact that it has already been weaponized by the military. These frequencies are so poor at travelling long distances, they need a transmitter on nearly every telephone pole and light pole to make 5G work.
5G Explained By Researcher Arthur Firstenberg: Be Forewarned
Taos, New Mexico, August 12, 2018
An all-day symposium on 5G was held in Taos, New Mexico on Sunday, August 12, 2018. Arthur Firstenberg discussed the history, science, and description of 5G, including 5G from satellites in space, and its expected effects on all living things.
Click on this link to access Arthur Firstenberg’s 34:23 minutes of amazing facts about the relatively unknown and probably deliberately-withheld information about cell phones, cell towers, the inordinate push for 5G rollout and the emerging data via independent research regarding adverse health effects from 5G millimeter wave radiation streaming down from thousands of ionosphere-placed satellites, plus 5G cell towers parked outside your homes, e.g., front doors or bedroom windows, with your not being able to protest them, nor have them removed!
We did not evolve with microwaves; they are foreign to us.
Source: 5G Explained By Researcher Arthur Firstenberg: Be Forewarned